rouletteright.blogg.se

Comment section removed gawker univision
Comment section removed gawker univision





comment section removed gawker univision comment section removed gawker univision
  1. #Comment section removed gawker univision serial
  2. #Comment section removed gawker univision professional

He was later acquitted of rape but sought action against legal news blog Above the Law and Gawker-owned Jezebel for suggesting in stories that he was a serial rapist. The last story marked for removal involved a lawyer and former life insurance salesman named Meanith Huon, who sued Gawker in 2011 for allegedly implying that he had sexually assaulted a woman he had met through Craigslist. It is unclear if Williams was in the process of appealing that ruling. In June, a New Jersey Superior Court granted summary judgment to Gawker in the Williams case. Trotter in California, as well as stories on former baseball player Mitch Williams, who was fired from his commentating job at MLB Network after Deadspin reported about his alleged poor behavior at children's baseball games. Univision will also take down a Deadspin article about internet troll Chuck Johnson, who sued Gawker and journalists Greg Howard and J.K. Ayyadurai, however, has previously denied Thiel's involvement with his case. Ayyadurai is being represented by Charles Harder, who was paid by Thiel to be a lawyer for Hogan. Among them is an on-going suit from Shiva Ayyadurai, an academic who sued Gawker Media, Cook and journalist Sam Biddle after the company ran a story on Gizmodo that disputed his claims that he invented email. The six posts now in question are associated with four lawsuits against Gawker Media. That story was widely rebuked, leading to the resignations of two editors and sweeping organizational changes by then-CEO Nick Denton. close of the deal. At 8:30 p.m., Felipe Holguin, effectively the interim CEO for the six former Gawker Media sites, and Jay Grant, the acting general counsel, used a provision in Gawker Media's collective bargaining agreement to vote for their deletion.Īccording to Cook, this is the first time posts will be eliminated from Gawker Media's sites since the company took down a controversial story about a former media executive and his alleged extramarital affairs. At around noon in New York on Friday, Cook was notified by Heather Dietrick, Gawker Media's former president and general counsel, that Univision's leaders were intent on deciding on the posts' removal ahead of the 11:59 p.m. Though Cook said he had conversations with Isaac Lee, Univision’s chief news, entertainment and digital officer, regarding the status of old stories with ongoing legal issues, he did not expect the company to delete those posts. Univision purchased six of those assets-all news sites-though that did not include media and politics site, which shut down last month. Following bankruptcy, Gawker was forced to sell its assets in a court-supervised auction in August. It was later revealed that billionaire venture capitalist Peter Thiel, who had held a personal grudge against the media organization, had been funding Hogan's lawsuit and others against Gawker in an attempt to destroy the company.

#Comment section removed gawker univision professional

In June, Gawker Media filed for bankruptcy after losing a landmark case to former professional Hulk Hogan, who sued the New York-based company for invading his privacy by publishing clips from his sex tape. Sources told FORBES at the time that Univision was concerned with exposing itself to unnecessary legal risks by keeping past stories online.Ī representative for Univision could not be immediately reached for comment. As FORBES reported last month, Univision's lawyers were seriously considering the removal of contentious posts associated with continued legal action and had already opened dialogue with the lawyers of plaintiffs who had previously sued Gawker Media. Univision's decision to take down the six posts was one that had been weighed in the weeks after the company announced itself as the winning bidder for Gawker's assets. It’s very difficult to see posts getting erased from the internet." "When they attack us for doing that, we stand by our reporters and we stand by our stories. "This decision was an affront to an idea that we have been committed to for 13 years, which is that we should be able to say true things about public figures," Cook said to FORBES.







Comment section removed gawker univision